(DOWNLOAD) "State v. Dishman" by Supreme Court of North Carolina No. 145 # Book PDF Kindle ePub Free
eBook details
- Title: State v. Dishman
- Author : Supreme Court of North Carolina No. 145
- Release Date : January 25, 1959
- Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 52 KB
Description
From time to time for more than 50 years, the Court has stated the minimum requirements for valid assignments of error. ""Just what will constitute a sufficiently specific assignment must depend very largely upon the special circumstances of the particular case; but always the very error relied upon should be definitely and clearly presented, and the Court not compelled to go beyond the assignment itself to learn what the question is. The assignment must be so specific that the Court is given some real aid and a voyage of discovery through an often voluminous record not rendered necessary."" {PA} Page 761} Thompson v. R.R., 147 N.C. 412, 61 S.E. 286. ""What the Court desires, and, indeed, the least any appellate court requires, is that the exceptions which are boan fide presented to the court for decision, as the points determinative of the appeal, shall be stated clearly and intelligently by the assignment of errors, and not by referring to the record, and therewith shall be set out so much of the evidence, or of the charge, or other matter or circumstance (as the case may be) as shall be necessary to present clearly the matter to be debated."" Greene v. Dishman, 202 N.C. 811, 164 S.E. 342; Rogers v. Jones, 172 N.C. 156, 90 S.E. 117; Steelman v. Benfield, 228 N.C. 651, 46 S.E.2d 829; Allen v. Allen, 244 N.C. 446, 94 S.E.2d 325; Tillis v. Cotton Mills, 244 N.C. 587, 94 S.E.2d 600; Armstrong v. Howard, 244 N.C. 598, 94 S.E.2d 594; Lowie v. Atkins, 245 N.C. 98, 95 S.E.2d 271; Hunt v. Davis, 248 N.C. 69, 102 S.E.2d 405; Nichols v. McFarland, 249 N.C. 125, 105 S.E.2d 294; Pamlico County v. Davis, ante, 648.